19 comments

• 

  sam van eman

  12 months ago

  Does he really want that much input? My daughters don't even want that much input. They ask for help or suggestions, but they certainly don't enjoy being micro-managed.
  I like having a say in where our country is going and welcome opportunities to voice my opinion, but this seems more like a wooing of the crowd, or at least a way for Obama to avoid being the lightening rod Bush has been.
  Regarding work, I wouldn't want this to be part of MY job description.
  reply
• 

  Sam

  12 months ago

  Mark,
  If that happens, I can't wait to leave a comment on Obama's blog. But if it's moderated like CNN's comments section, it'll never show up.
  Maybe that should be a cabinet post - comments editor.
  -Sam
  reply
• 

  Robert Treskillard

  12 months ago

  10,000,000 comments ... now sort through that!
  
  It's a blogocracy!
  reply
• 

  J.Dean

  12 months ago

  With his experience, he needs all the input he can get.
  reply
• 

  nancy

  12 months ago

  it just doesn't matter much to me
  reply
• 

  selahV

  12 months ago

  Hello, I came by way of Ken Coffee's blog. My first comment would be:
  "This is like a ridiculous waste of public funds." selahV
  reply
• 

  heather

  12 months ago

  The YouTube updates remind me of FDR's fireside chats.
  I know I have no way of politically helping. But thanks for asking anyway!
  reply
• 

  heather

  12 months ago

  Gasp! My comment showed up!
  reply
• 

  L.L. Barkat

  12 months ago

  Somebody get cold water, quick! Heather is gasping. : )
  reply
• 

  spaghettipie

  12 months ago

  I've definitely thought it was fascinating to see Presidential candidates with blogs, and myspace and facebook pages. This takes it to a whole new level. Seems to me it sounds like a good idea, but when you get to the implementation part, it's a ridiculous waste. Not to mention (as others point out) the censorship part. I hate to think about the way public opinion could be slanted or swayed based upon what is kept out of comments. And how do you ensure the "voice of the people" is really represented, rather than lobbyist or activist groups? And as the President of the United States, I want someone who can be decisive and make decisions in the best interest of the country. . . not someone who has to consult the comments on his blog for five days first. hmm, the more I think about this, the more it troubles me.
  reply
• 

  Gordon Atkinson

  11 months ago

  After this presidency, my standards are low. I'm looking for a president who won't take us to war for reasons that turn out to be wrong and then never admit it and keep us in the war anyway, at the cost of thousands of lives and over a trillion dollars. And one that will consider a national health care system.
  
  So Obama can twitter, tweet, hoot, blog, whatever he wants.
  reply
• 

  Marcus

  11 months ago

  Thanks for the great comments everyone. I especially appreciate that you all have shared your opinions here without attacking each other. Politics can be so sticky.
  
  Funny. I wrote this post so quickly after reading the article over breakfast. You just never know what will inspire comments, you know?
  reply
• 

  Camille

  11 months ago

  Obama (if elected) may twitter, tweet, hoot, and blog---but will he be part of the community and listen, or will he be there to make carefully crafted political noise?
  I'm trying to picture someone at lecturn intercommunicating in a room full of 10million people.
  
  And I don't know about all y'all, but e-exposure is kinder to me than face-to-face real time. You can tweak what you twitter and buff what you blog to give the best possible impression. Just the best parts, Ma'am. A chance to nip those Dubbya & predecessors gaffes and faux pas in the bud.
  reply
• 

  Shep

  11 months ago

  We do live in a fallen world and everything can and will be twisted, but communication is always a good thing, no matter the medium. Even if it is just attempted communication. And it seems to me that it is inevitable that this medium will continue to grow and weave itself into the fabric of our lives, to include our government(s) and bloggers should welcome it and participate in it. Why else are you here if not to communicate?
  reply
• 

  christa allan

  11 months ago

  Mark:
  i'm going to have to stir this around my little gumbo pot of a brain for some time. But...hmm...will other countries' heads of states be following n their own Twitters?
  
  And is Twitter going to be eligible for federal funding because if it can't keep my "OLDER" button working consistently to get me past the first page, how's it going to handle possibly milliions?
  
  And while I appreciate his being open to technology's influence and power, I also wonder (and maybe worry) how much weight those opinions will carry as an wingnut can be on Twitter. I mean, I am, so...
  
  And wouldn't it create even more gov't muckamucks? We'll have to create a Department of Twittering and appoint Twittees to follow the Twitters and who'll report to the chief twit...
  reply
• 

  Ted Gossard

  11 months ago

  Yes, Marcus. This could be all too consuming, yet if it's kept in a good place so that it would occupy, say a President Obama only for a small space of his time with good summaries, I think all well and good. And why not more communication through using YouTube and the like? We need more careful discourse and discussion, and hopefully getting away from the sound bite.
  
  But just my small take.
  reply
• 

  Sam

  11 months ago

  Mark, are you aware of this website? http://www.sfwa.org/
  -Sam
  reply
• 

  Lady Jane Grey

  11 months ago

  I am hesitant to be excited about anything that minimizes the stature of the office of the President of the United States to the level of my youth kids! On one hand, it's great to be accessible and make your constituents feel involved, but I think basing your decisions on public opinion to this extent might make him look weak. A president is supposed to be a decision maker, not a follower. Obama, while he is trying to represent a new age in politics, does not need to look any weaker, given his lack of experience in executive positions.
  
  It reminds me of the Clinton administration, who based many of their decisions on polls. Just LEAD!
  reply
• 

  jp

  11 months ago

  Better a president who listens, than one who doesn't. Better a president who twitters than one who is learning to use the internet. Better a president who is clear about his religious beliefs than one who seems to hide it. Better a president who is distracted by the American people than a president distracted by the war machine.
  reply