<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>GoodWordEditing.com - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-6d63e1ee" type="application/json"/><link>http://goodwordediting.disqus.com/</link><description>Editing, writing, faith, and work. And poetry because I like poetry.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:21:36 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: 10 best high calling blog posts of 2008</title><link>http://www.goodwordediting.com/10-best-high-calling-blog-posts-of-2008/634/#comment-5095492</link><description>Marcus, on my top 10 are the daily devotionals. I love getting those from you in the morning, always a thought provoking insight that challenges me to go deeper in my faith. Thanks for sharing these posts, I had missed many of them and look forward to reading.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KarenSwim</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:21:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook and Disqus Lead the Way to Transparency</title><link>http://www.goodwordediting.com/facebook-and-disqus-lead-the-way-to-transparency/612/#comment-5075778</link><description>I am not sure what you mean by transparency online. A DISQUS profile is only as transparent as the creator of it allowed it to be...And an application like that encourages people to work harder at being anonymous and maintaining different aliases.  (Thanks for the tip DHCBR)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Really though, this isn't about transparency, it is an objection to an over-controlling application and to having everything said in it compiled together.  When I roll over a profile and see a bunch of comments unrelated to the blog posting I am on, it is actually confusing and gives me a feeling of having walked in to someone else's conversation. I do not feel the need to be in on everything you have to say to everyone else.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This would however be a nice way for me to keep track of everything I am commenting on.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Unclaim My Heart</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:57:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 10 best high calling blog posts of 2008</title><link>http://www.goodwordediting.com/10-best-high-calling-blog-posts-of-2008/634/#comment-5028868</link><description>Great list!  Congratulations everyone :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lorrie</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 22:27:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 11 minutes with a great Christian poet - Jeanne Murray Walker</title><link>http://www.goodwordediting.com/11-minutes-with-a-great-christian-poet-jeanne-murray-walker/640/#comment-5025894</link><description>And... if we don't fancy ourselves to be poets? Um, what then?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(I took the liberty to listen anyway and liked it. : )</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">L.L. Barkat</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 19:53:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google says books beat websites in credibility</title><link>http://www.goodwordediting.com/google-says-books-beat-websites-in-credibility/629/#comment-5014301</link><description>I love the internet for the volume of information I can easily obtain. I'd love to have something like the Kindle one day, just to save space when I need to have several books with me; for instance, it would be a great tool during Bible study, or in any class or study situation. But to truly enjoy reading, I need books. I need to feel the paper pages between my fingers, be able to take my reading to bed and use it in any prone or sitting position until I fall asleep, and I need to be able to make notes in the borders, and underline favorite lines.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't believe books will ever go away. Their enjoyment will only be enhanced by new tools which make it easier to find them and reference them at will.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Diane L. Harris</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 12:51:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Two Fun Friday Links: Nietzsche Family Circus and Garfield Minus Garfield</title><link>http://www.goodwordediting.com/two-fun-friday-links-nietzsche-family-circus-and-garfield-minus-garfield/631/#comment-5013025</link><description>Hmm. I used the "press this" function of wordpress to insert that image, and it seems to be defaulting to steal bandwidth from that site. Bizarre. Is image etiquette changing?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">goodwordediting</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 11:40:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google says books beat websites in credibility</title><link>http://www.goodwordediting.com/google-says-books-beat-websites-in-credibility/629/#comment-5003564</link><description>OK, so I am a book purist. I love the feel of the book, relishing its broken binding, knowing how many pages remain before the book comes to its climax, and being able to throw it across the room when I've finished it. (I'm pretty sure only guys do that.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm a library and Half-Price-Books connoisseur. There's nothing like wandering the stacks and coming across that "bluebird" find that I didn't expect. I hold it tightly and caress it gently, whispering "my precious," ala Gollum, all the way home. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But then Santa brought me a Kindle. And overnight my world is upside-down. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Suddenly, whatever I feel like reading, is instantaneously (or faster) available. Read a book review that sounds interesting? WHAM! I own it. Hear an author speak on NPR? BAM! I own his entire collected works! Make small talk at a party and someone mentions what they're reading? I sneak off to the corner and order it. Suddenly, I have the power to own anything my heart desires! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And my reaction? I'm freaked out! Way back when I delivered newspapers, I scrimped and saved for every Hardy Boys mystery in my collection. I spent hours in the library until I discovered Michael and, later, Jeff Shaara's historical accounts of American wars. And then I languished in each volume. But that is all such foolishness now. What a colossal waste of time! Today, Amazon tells me what I should read.  And everything else that everyone else read when they read what I read. We've moved even beyond instant gratification. It's like simultaneous gratification - think it, and it's yours.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is this a good thing? I love it, but yet... I can't help but feel I've been able to satisfy my desires at the expense of something greater. When something doesn't really cost anything, how valuable is it? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I love my Kindle. It's makes reading very efficient. But where's the joy?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 23:50:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google says books beat websites in credibility</title><link>http://www.goodwordediting.com/google-says-books-beat-websites-in-credibility/629/#comment-5001491</link><description>Marcus,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I’m with you.  I write in an electronic medium because I can. However, reading something on a monitor, regardless of how big it is, just doesn’t seem quite as “real” as reading it from the pages of a book.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I’m sure there will come a day when words on paper have gone the  way of horse draw carriage.  Call me old fashion if you like but  I’ll stay with the printed word on a page of paper for the time being.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bill</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill Cash</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 21:26:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google says books beat websites in credibility</title><link>http://www.goodwordediting.com/google-says-books-beat-websites-in-credibility/629/#comment-4995901</link><description>I agree that books beat websites in credibility. Think about the cost involved with printing compared to going to the web. Sending things to print costs money...  before a dime is ever actually made on sales. If something makes it to print, then that means that somebody thought that it was credible enough to invest in it. And with the tightening economy, many publishers are tightening up on what they print which means that it must be of even higher standards now. I think that when you see something in print, that it would have gone through much greater scrutny than something that just goes to web.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I use digital reading only as a 'window' into what I buy on paper. Any extensive reading for me is much better on paper than online (or a Kindle). &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Online does however offer the opportunity to reach a wide audience with very little investment...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BibleDude</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 16:22:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google says books beat websites in credibility</title><link>http://www.goodwordediting.com/google-says-books-beat-websites-in-credibility/629/#comment-4995520</link><description>I'm in trouble! My comprehension is never higher than when I read a book held in my hands. Reading on a PC screen is just not the same for me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If all goes digital, I become a literary dinosaur overnight.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyC</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 16:00:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google says books beat websites in credibility</title><link>http://www.goodwordediting.com/google-says-books-beat-websites-in-credibility/629/#comment-4995800</link><description>AndyC, Kindle is never meant to replace books. At least not for awhile. I'd  &lt;br&gt;argue that books are the perfect machine, in fact. But if I have to choose  &lt;br&gt;between carrying 20 books with me and carrying one Kindle type device, then  &lt;br&gt;I'm more likely to choose the Kindle. I don't think books will ever go  &lt;br&gt;away. TV didn't replace radio. Radio didn't replace newspapers. Even the  &lt;br&gt;web isn't replacing newspapers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But publishing is going to look different 20 years from now, that's one  &lt;br&gt;thing I'm willing to predict.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">goodwordediting</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 15:18:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook and Disqus Lead the Way to Transparency</title><link>http://www.goodwordediting.com/facebook-and-disqus-lead-the-way-to-transparency/612/#comment-4969978</link><description>funny exchange between hcb reader and l.l. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;i'm still too green to know what's really going with this topic, but i enjoyed reading about it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sam van eman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:21:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook and Disqus Lead the Way to Transparency</title><link>http://www.goodwordediting.com/facebook-and-disqus-lead-the-way-to-transparency/612/#comment-4963860</link><description>I love your idealism. :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And, at least for my part, I'm not so interested in being anonymous (though that can be fun sometimes). I just like the idea of being able to choose whether or not my comments are mini-blogged.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">L.L. Barkat</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 13:05:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 3 Christmas Gift Themes</title><link>http://www.goodwordediting.com/3-christmas-gift-themes/559/#comment-4961332</link><description>We dealt with the commercial Christmas in two ways this year:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1) My wife made about 3/4 of the gifts we gave to friends/family. I wish I could claim some of the credit, but she's the crafty one. There's something cool about handmade gifts, especially when they're well-thought out for each person and not just a tea cozy (whatever that is).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2) For our immediate family we &lt;a href="http://www.kevindhendricks.com/2008/12/08/you-can-change-the-world-redefining-christmas/" rel="nofollow"&gt;redefined Christmas&lt;/a&gt; so that half the money that would be spent on gifts for us had to be given away. So if we were going to spend $40 on my daughter for Christmas, we'd buy her $20 in gifts and then she had $20 to give away as she saw fit.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Since my daughter is just turning 3 I'm not sure she completely grasped the concept, but in a few years I think she will. As for my wife and I, it was great. It meant a smaller Christmas but also more giving to the people who really need it. I found freedom in having a small of wad of cash I could just give away.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">facebook-513401767</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 10:58:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 3 Christmas Gift Themes</title><link>http://www.goodwordediting.com/3-christmas-gift-themes/559/#comment-4961395</link><description>I really like the idea of giving the kids money to choose what charity it&lt;br&gt;goes to! That's so simple, but also makes generosity feel like a treat.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">goodwordediting</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 10:03:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook and Disqus Lead the Way to Transparency</title><link>http://www.goodwordediting.com/facebook-and-disqus-lead-the-way-to-transparency/612/#comment-4961308</link><description>Interesting discussion here. For some reason, as owner of the blog, the&lt;br&gt;annonymity still bothers me. For me social media is about being social. How&lt;br&gt;can we be social if no one knows who we are? More and more, I'm becoming an&lt;br&gt;advocate for transparency online.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That doesn't mean we don't still allow ourselves privacy. But we shouldn't&lt;br&gt;expect a published comment on a public website or blog to be a place where&lt;br&gt;privacy is an option.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When you visit glass houses, people will see what you do there.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">goodwordediting</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 09:56:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Good Words for High Calling Bloggers</title><link>http://www.goodwordediting.com/good-words-for-high-calling-bloggers/317/#comment-4961135</link><description>Jesse and Sarah,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We're glad you've joined! If you haven't filled out the application form at&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://highcallingblogs.com/about/join/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://highcallingblogs.com/about/join/&lt;/a&gt; that will help. L. L. Barkat will&lt;br&gt;get in touch with you about adding your RSS feed to the site.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The main thing is to read the featured posts and comment on blogs in the&lt;br&gt;network.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We also encourage people to install Lijit and Disqus. Both tools help the&lt;br&gt;network connect more closely through search and comments.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">goodwordediting</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 09:50:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Good Words for High Calling Bloggers</title><link>http://www.goodwordediting.com/good-words-for-high-calling-bloggers/317/#comment-4948832</link><description>Newbie here; I joined but I'm still not sure how to make my own posting.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Since I have my own site elsewhere do I just post there and it shows up on High Callings?  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Where do I post on High Callings, and can it also be something from my own site?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jesse and Sarah</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:46:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook and Disqus Lead the Way to Transparency</title><link>http://www.goodwordediting.com/facebook-and-disqus-lead-the-way-to-transparency/612/#comment-4946292</link><description>L.L., no problem [he says, just as innocently].&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Which one would you like?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And remember, before you try this trick in the privacy of your own home, you might want to come up with a different name than your own real name. Otherwise you and I and Venerable Blog Owner may become one, which may or may not be of interest to you.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Devoted HCB Reader</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:27:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook and Disqus Lead the Way to Transparency</title><link>http://www.goodwordediting.com/facebook-and-disqus-lead-the-way-to-transparency/612/#comment-4940914</link><description>Devoted HCB Reader... so, like, hey, what's your email? ;-) [she says innocently]</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">L.L. Barkat</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:09:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook and Disqus Lead the Way to Transparency</title><link>http://www.goodwordediting.com/facebook-and-disqus-lead-the-way-to-transparency/612/#comment-4937493</link><description>It works (just click the profile for VBO and see how we're linked. [fanfare and squeals of equal volume to yours, L.L.]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mischievous Devoted HCB Reader and Venerable Blog Owner are now as one. Good thing Mischievous Devoted HCB Reader doesn’t atually know VBO’s email. Yet.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mischievous Devoted HCB Reader</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:47:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook and Disqus Lead the Way to Transparency</title><link>http://www.goodwordediting.com/facebook-and-disqus-lead-the-way-to-transparency/612/#comment-4937435</link><description>Here I am trying it out.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Venerable Blog Owner</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:43:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook and Disqus Lead the Way to Transparency</title><link>http://www.goodwordediting.com/facebook-and-disqus-lead-the-way-to-transparency/612/#comment-4937399</link><description>L.L., so you like that trick?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here’s another good one. Or maybe actually a bad one--which serves to make the point about the need for greater commenter control.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let’s say that the name of the blog owner here was not “goodwordediting” but rather “venerable blog owner.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let’s say that, just for kicks, Mischievous Devoted HCB Reader comes along and wants to razz Venerable Blog Owner. MDHCBR would have to know VBO’s email to accomplish this, but the following could happen (mischievously, or, less likely, accidentally)…&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;MDHCBR could leave a comment using VBO’s email and… magic of all magic… MDHCBR could become part of VBO’s comment thread, as if the two were one.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But enough of trying to explain. Let’s try it out so you can see.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mischievous Devoted HCB Reader</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:41:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook and Disqus Lead the Way to Transparency</title><link>http://www.goodwordediting.com/facebook-and-disqus-lead-the-way-to-transparency/612/#comment-4936833</link><description>Oh, oh, oh! It works!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I feel so...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;opaque. : )</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">L.L. Barkat</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:09:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook and Disqus Lead the Way to Transparency</title><link>http://www.goodwordediting.com/facebook-and-disqus-lead-the-way-to-transparency/612/#comment-4936829</link><description>Okay, here I am trying it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">L.L. Barkat</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:08:33 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>