14 comments

• 

  Brandon Satrom

  1 year ago

  "Too much of our political rhetoric comes from our ideologies rather than our theology"
  
  I don't know if those were Tony's words, or your summary of them, or a little bit of both. Doesn't matter, a brilliant and accurate observation.
  
  Your whole recounting of Tony's answer is great, actually. Treat all your choices as worship. All your work as a high calling. And all your decisions as worthy of God's leading and input.
  
  Mark, you've put some words to my feelings and have publicly asked some questions that I think need to be asked, regardless of which party or candidate one plans to support.
  
  Thanks for that. You rock.
  
  - Brandon
  reply
• 

  Susan

  1 year ago

  I want to believe that it all matters - that it all is a high calling, but I find myself feeling very weighted down by that. If it all matters, then we need to have the mind of God on all of it - right - else we're going to get our decisions and actions wrong. Since I'm having trouble seeing the higher calling in day to day life- my own life - I think it intrinsically gives me problems with seeing a higher calling in anthing else - if it's not personal first - how I work, how I clean my house, how I file my taxes, how I do dishes - then it doesn't really matter anyway.
  
  Susan's last blog post..Once Upon A Time
  reply
• 

  Marcus

  1 year ago

  Brandon, the distinction between ideology and theology was all Tony Jones. The high calling stuff was all me.
  
  Susan, it all matters--but the yoke is easy and the burden is light. At least it's supposed to be. Sometimes it doesn't feel light at all.
  
  I agree with you completely about making it personal first. That's why I wonder if we can even talk about this stuff without being pompous jerks.
  
  And that's also why I linked to the song "Be the change you want to see" despite it's barely veiled political agenda to promote the democratic candidate.
  
  There's something "high calling"-ish about taking responsibility for holy living by being it rather than talking about it.
  reply
• 

  blake

  1 year ago

  That second question (i.e., what does it look like when voters worship through their engagement in politics) is HUGE. I've grown frustrated trying to find the answer for me personally. I really loathe the extremism in politics and all the rhetoric that goes with it. But I also want to be the socially engaged Christian God wants me to become. Trying to find what that means... really difficult. Thanks for this post.
  
  blake's last blog post..The Opposite of Love is Indifference
  reply
• 

  L.L. Barkat

  1 year ago

  I admit I am having trouble coming with an answer, mostly because there are so many questions here and I'm trying to discern what your central question really is.
  
  Maybe the best answer is found in your own marriage... a wife who claims "liberal" on Facebook, while you instead claim "moderate." Yet you live and love together. Why, you even went so far as to have children!
  
  Can we, should we live and love together despite our differing views? How far do we, should we go in expressing that love? Simple tolerance? Or do we produce, even, "children"?
  
  Sorry. It seems I have finally answered your question/s with questions of my own. : )
  
  L.L. Barkat's last blog post..Visitation
  reply
• 

  nancy

  1 year ago

  hi brother,
  first, i would like to know what you mean by "bothered by". if something is bothering us to a certain degree, i wonder if it is time to take a good look at where it is actually coming from, and how it is working out in your life... can it be questioned and examined from a spiritual point of view. how are we as Christians to react to the uncomfortable feelings of frustration or anger that may bother us when we are looking at other people and questioning their beliefs and their life choices? if the choices seem unfair or do not match up with what we think is right...what do we do with these feelings. we must be careful of the fine line that we can easily cross into a place that is not right for ourselves in how we look upon others and how we conduct ourselves.
  
  nancy's last blog post..a new song... go ahead and sing it
  reply
• 

  Dana King

  1 year ago

  It is an interesting time right now, with Tolle writing about how to connect with the divine by abandoning the ego and Wright's book about the Kingdom of Heaven being something that Christians are supposed to be working on bringing about here on earth. Lots of writers (Christian and non-Christian) seem to me to be pointing to pretty much the same thing. The solutions come from love and acceptance, not from trying to conquer or change. It is frustrating to feel that all the political leaders seem out of touch with the movements toward harmony and stewardship. And, personally, it is demoralizing to feel that there is nothing that can really be done about the sort of people we are supposed to choose from... A few months ago, I read The Great Awakening by Jim Wallis, which goes a long way to breaking your second question to your Mr. Jones into specific answers covering a whole array of areas and issues.
  
  I also have to say that I think it is possible to talk about big issues without sounding like pompous jerks. Ego drives our need to be right and to win. Being solely interested in one's own "rightness" and in proving to the other that they are wrong rather than having a sincere desire to deal with a situation in wisdom is choosing to be a pompous jerk. Being able to accept that sin is everywhere (in all of us) and that issues like abortion, gay marraige, war, or the death penalty really do have sin on both sides of the issue makes an actual dicussion possible rather than the usual debate.
  
  Dana King's last blog post..the difference between me and my daughter: more excerpted reflections
  reply
• 

  Sam

  1 year ago

  Mark,
  Thanks for this post. Where can I find the interview with Tony Jones?
  Also, I like the last set of questions "What would you do if you were president? Does it matter? Because you won’t be. What would you do if you were a voter? Does it matter?"
  Well of course it matters because that's how we pick someone who can veto congress and lead the ship of state.
  Also, in the end I'll vote like most people - for the candidate most like myself.
  Ok, maybe I better think about that.
  -Sam
  
  Sam's last blog post..Politics, Anger at God and Children’s Boredom
  reply
• 

  Rebecca LuElla Miller

  1 year ago

  Thanks for this excellent post, Mark. I just rant ... uh, expressed my opinion about the polarization in America, too, though I focused on how it affects our endorsement/recommendations regarding works of art. I'm putting much of the problem at the feet of a lack of discernment. Much easier to parrot the opinion of Big Name Christian than to examine Scripture and draw a reasoned conclusion I believe to be God-honoring.
  
  So too with politics.
  
  But here's the real deal. If My Guy gets elected or not, I still have the responsibility to pray for the President. I wonder if Christians took that role seriously what God might do in the life of that man, whoever he might be.
  
  Becky
  
  Rebecca LuElla Miller's last blog post..The Turquoise and Red Mentality
  reply
• 

  Ted Gossard

  1 year ago

  I agree that we need to start with ourselves as to begin to understand where our "high calling" lies, first at home and then with the special works God seems to set before us, for which we're specially designed (Ephesians 2:10).
  
  But we must work to bring it out into every area. After all, we're commanded to love God with all our heart, mind, soul and strength- and with that to love our neighbor as ourself, at the same time praying that God's will will be done on earth as it is in heaven.
  
  So I think we have to work through the muck of politics and I don't think this election, for example, is a clear cut case of black and white. And even with the platforms of the two major parties- for me the same, not black versus white.
  
  So I think we have to pray, to be in the word and seeking to meet the high calling of God for us in all of life, beginning where the rubber meets the road in our own lives, and then work at making the best judgment possible in voting come November.
  
  I'm an Independent registered here in Michigan and have been kind of rethinking my anabaptism which is admittedly not entirely pure, anyhow, though anabaptism really includes a spectrum. But I think we Christians need to be involved in public life. Maybe it's the Calvinism where I live rubbing off on me a bit, but that part of it I think has a good point.
  
  And I think as long as we're working through this, and trying to be informed as well as subjecting it all to God in prayer and our reading of Scripture, then I think we just have to make the best decision we can, and vote accordingly.
  
  I know how I'd vote if I had to do so now, and I'll listen to both, and let the process play out, but I'll be glad when it's all said and done.
  
  Ted Gossard's last blog post..quote of the week
  reply
• 

  Carl Holmes

  1 year ago

  Welcome to the Emergent side of life. That is basically what the emergent conversation is in a nut shell. Thinking through life and the stinky cheese that goes with it, thinking through how we have really manhandled the situation and how we can bring what we do back in line with our beliefs and with the biblical call to live life in accordance with it.
  
  Carl Holmes's last blog post..Prayer and the power within it
  reply
• 

  Amy

  1 year ago

  Gerbil marriage?
  
  L.L. - it's not hard at all ;).
  reply
• 

  Sarah Martin

  1 year ago

  See, this is the problem I have with todays political conversation: if people disagree on an issue, they immediately deem the other their enemy. Instead of recognizing that there is a difference of opinion, they immediately assume that the other person is personally attacking them.
  
  If we could all learn to separate personal attacks from cognitive dissonance, we'd all be much better off.
  
  The Inklings met in an Oxford pub and discussed vastly different ideas about God, theology, politics, philosphy, etc., and were the best of friends for it. They were some of the most brilliant minds of this century. We would all do well to learn from their example.
  
  Sarah Martin's last blog post..It's official...
  reply
• 

  Danny Wright

  1 year ago

  It is an American luxury today that we can be friends with those that think it OK to let a baby born alive die, after all, we are not babies. I think the death toll since Roe v Wade makes Germany's attempted annihilation of the Jews look half way decent. Perhaps Dietrich Bonhoeffer's Confessing Church had it all wrong after all. One thing's for sure, there's nothing new under the sun.
  reply